On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:42:09 -0600, jhell <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, [email protected] wrote:
Hi there.
I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can
anybody shed the light what was changed?
The graphics/jpeg port was updated such that the version number of
libjpeg.so was increased. This necessitated a revision bump in all the
ports that depend on graphics/jpeg. There are *many* such ports.
Thanks.
[r...@smeshariki2 ~]# portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap1.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from Fri Feb 5 06:44:34 MSK 2010 to Fri Feb 5 15:57:40 MSK
2010.
Fetching 4 metadata patches... done.
Applying metadata patches... done.
Fetching 0 metadata files... done.
Fetching 4282 patches.....
I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred
this type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was made....
Read this:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-January/059241.html
Guess that doesn't stand for everything.
Stick to package if you can't handle it.
Was there some type of security concern that caused this bump of jpeg in
the first place or was it just a creeping featurism?
--
[email protected] - [email protected]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [email protected]
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
