On 2010-Mar-31, 03:41, Xin LI wrote: > I will merge an upstream change from zlib, which basically unexpose LFS > stuff on FreeBSD, and I plan to keep the off_t bits == 64. However, I would > highly recommend ports maintainers to push upstream fix for LFS64 definition > removal since they are wrong on FreeBSD
Sounds great, thanks! > > On Mar 31, 2010 3:30 AM, "Pietro Cerutti" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2010-Mar-27, 02:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Xin LI <[email protected]> writes: > > > So... ... > Just to make it clear so that everyone knows how we're going to handle > this: are you (src people) going to commit a fix to unexpose LFS crap > or are we (ports people) supposed to fix each and every single port > that supposes to be on Linux? > > The attentive reader will note a bias towards the former :) > > -- > Pietro Cerutti > The FreeBSD Project > [email protected] > > PGP Public Key: > http://gahr.ch/pgp > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project [email protected] PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp
pgpbtgmgIxofi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
