On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
As should be obvious by now I'm following through on my previously
stated plans to remove the no longer necessary %%RC_SUBR%% and
%%RC_SUBR_SUFFIX%% from the ports tree.
Does it still make sense to use
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
as recommended by rc.subr(8) or should we just use
rcvar=${name}_enable
as shown in the Porter's Handbook example?
Either one is fine. I've always regarded set_rcvar as a little bit too
much abstraction, but that doesn't mean it's "wrong" to use it.
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
