On 09/08/10 18:15, Jerry wrote:

Portmanager did have a nasty bug that involved looping. It was fixed
ages ago though. Are you running the latest version; i.e., "0.4.1_9" on
your system? Run "portmanager -v" to confirm.

Without the '-p' option, portmanager only looks 1 level deep. with the
'-p' option, it will search the entire dependency chain. I always use
the '-p' option and never experience any problems described by you.


Not sure if the -p does that or not, but I *did* read (more than just a few times) about the -p (meaning "pristine") option, and from the reading, it doesn't tell me that it might affect looping, and I didn't see anything about it in the man page. I didn't just try it and immediately mail, I tried to DTRT.

Doesn't matter too much to me now, because I really love the fact that I did 4 *very* large (meaning lengthy dependency lists) ports, with 100% 1st-time accuracy, which means I will stay with portmaster for sure now. Also, because those ports are now all installed, and I don't want to take a few days to rebuild everything all over again.

It looks like, in the default case, portmanager detects more problems than it deals with, which is not a desirable default action. It's probably a needed default action for some use case ... do you happen to know what that is?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to