Dominic Fandrey <kamik...@bsdforen.de> writes: > On 16/09/2010 19:17, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: >> * Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote: >> >>> Just out of curiosity, why a version bump because of a build >>> dependency? >>> >>> I don't think an autoconf update should have an effect on any >>> /running/ software but build systems. And I don't see how rebuilding >>> all the software improves it. >>> >>> This is not a criticism - I just think there is something I don't >>> understand and that worries me.
My guess is to uncover *early* build failures that exp-run didn't catch. Example is the breakage of databases/postgresql84-server + WITH_ICU. >> I second the question. Revision bump seem absolutely unnecessary. > > There was the sweeping commit reason in another thread. > > But I don't really think it would have been a sweeping commit if > it weren't for the version bump. Did you forget that autoconf262 was removed? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
