On 22 November 2010 17:17, Lars Engels <lars.eng...@0x20.net> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:21:31PM +0300, Eir Nym wrote: >> On 19 November 2010 18:32, Christian Weisgerber <na...@mips.inka.de> wrote: >> > Eir Nym <eir...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> Since when? If you are missing /bin/csh, your system is defective >> >> >>> or at least nonstandard. >> >> >> >> >> >> It is good joke, thanks >> >> > >> >> > I guess he's talking about the ports tree being too fragile for some >> >> > non-default configurations and not many people are willing to fix it. >> >> >> >> I understand this. Port can check this (because it is optional system >> >> component) and use another or generate error. >> > >> > This is very confusing. One of us is out of sync with reality. >> > (If it's me, I'd like to know.) Your confident claim that csh is >> > optional is like stating that the sky is green and the sun is purple. >> > >> > Did I miss something? >> >> If you think that any part of base system is mandatory, you should >> write request to remove knob WITHOUT_TCSH and any other, which you >> think is not optional. > > If you want support from the FreeBSD community, every part of the base > system is mandatory. >
But you have to check every optional. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
