On 2 May 2011 10:03, Matthias Andree <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 02.05.2011 10:49, schrieb Chris Rees: > >>> or otherwise issue a hint >>> that the port is kept for the benefit of those who happen to have a >>> distfile. >> >> Which is what, thirty people? > > I don't care. Let's not deliberately break the port for those who can > still use it. > > Please remove the EXPIRATION_DATE; I'm also willing to "maintain" the > port if needed. >
Although the port is already broken (no-one is deliberately breaking it), there is a possible (temporary) solution for those who want to use their own distfile. ITetcu, miwi, please would you have a look at [1]? It's partly lifted from the diablo ports; just makes it more convenient if one has the distfile already, as well as using IGNORE rather than BROKEN; we know it won't ever build. Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/skype-distfile.diff _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
