On May 10, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:05:02AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports?
>>
>> This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port
>> octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which
>> currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), and
>> the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function perfectly
>> well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf conflict
>> with each other.
>>
>> If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I
>> currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.)
>>
>> Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18?
>
> science/paraview is currently built with hdf5.
> Perhaps you should ask its maintainer, [email protected],
> whether hdf5-18 is a good idea.
Moving up to hdf5-18 would be best, if it's possible.
Quincey
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
