On 2 July 2011 00:36, Alberto Villa <avi...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2011 21:00:07 Rene Ladan wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to use ${CC} instead of cc in the above patch so
>> that clang is also (a bit more) supported?
>
> no. please, read the whole logic to understand how it works. that check is
> done to support cc == clang, which means that clang is completely
> supported
As I read it, while it supports a system where cc is a link to clang,
it still clobbers whatever ${CC} variable I have set.
Does this mean that I need to (should I wish to use clang) remove the
cc->gcc hardlink and replace it with a clang link? Doesn't really
sound right to me...
Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
