[ adding portmgr@ to the chain since we're in bpmk territory] On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 15:09:49 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote: > >On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote: > > > >>No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in > >>the Framework! > >> > >> From the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored. > > > >Along those lines, what about using groupmod instead of usermod? > >Perhaps due to my ignorance, it seems more straightforward and does not > >require much sed-fu; I've attached a (probably incomplete) patch to > >illustrate my thinking. I understand what I am suggesting could > >introduce other problems, so please do not construe it as an as-is > >suggestion, but rather something to stoke discussion. > > I tested your patch and it works for me. [ .. ] > It was tested on really old testing system... > > Thank you for your time and working solution. You are welcome - thanks again for reporting the problem and testing the new patch. I believe ohauer@ is taking a look at how else to achieve the desired behavior without introducing new problems. I hope we can get a fix into the tree soon. -- Sahil Tandon <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
