On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200 Matthias Andree <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke: > > > What the current FreeBSD policy of actively deleting perfectly > > usable ports instead of putting a mild hurdle in the way is saying, > > is that FreeBSD will stop me doing what I may want to do because > > FreeBSD knows best. > > The port isn't perfectly usable (because that would mean it's usable > in all circumstances for all advertised purposes, which is explicitly > not the case in the light of known vulnerabilities). And just how in the world can you verify that *any* port is "perfectly usable" by your definition? Should we just go ahead and delete every port in the collection then? -- Conrad J. Sabatier [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
