On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 08:46:10PM +0200, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote: > W dniu 2011-09-15 20:08, Chad Perrin pisze: > > > > If there was something broken with a FreeBSD port (a relative > > rarity), it would fail to install, leaving me with the older > > version. If there was something wrong with a Gentoo port, I'd end > > up with a broken install. > > That's true. But I've got probably less then 5 situations when Gentoo > port broke that way. Overall experience of every day portage use is > just plain better. I hope for some changes in FreeBSD's ports system, > we know where to look for some good ideas.
It seems we have different priorities. I *hate* having a software update break my software. I would rather go through an extra step or two when updating my software if it means I won't get an update that makes the software unusable. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpY0oEeYLHFW.pgp
Description: PGP signature