On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:31:36 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:04:20 -0700 > Stanislav Sedov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:59:38 +0300 > > Ion-Mihai Tetcu <[email protected]> mentioned: > > > > > Unfortunately we don't seem to have any other way to go, for the > > (and yes, I hate the idea) > > > > big majority of the ports. The fix is basically identical, so it > > > doesn't make sense to have a zillion of patch files in a zillion > > > of ports. > > > What, on the other hand, makes sense is to have the fix that > > > should include: > > > a) a KNOB (WITH_FBSD10_FIX or similar), > > > b) that only is run from bsd.port.mk when OSVERSION>1000000 > > > c) runs the latest version of the above patch. > > > The KNOB's existence allow us to turn on the fix only for broken > > > ports, and easily know what these broken ports are -- so we can > > > poke maintainers from time to time about upstream fixes, ... > > > > Sounds good to me. > > A few more days. Erwin is currently running a build on i386-10 with this and the following patches: - bsd.port.mk patch from beat (based on ed@, jilles@ and stas@ patches) - python patch from beat - python patch from linimon - WITH_FBSD10_FIX in: - textproc/expat2 - devel/pcre - devel/libtool - audio/libogg Results by Monday. If everything goes OK, we'll commit the patch. We're not sure if we'll have enough time for running other -exps to find the broken ports that need the "fix" before we need to concentrate on building the packages for the release, but we'll try. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> [email protected], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
