On 2011-Nov-11 12:40:12 -0800, Stanislav Sedov <s...@deglitch.com> wrote: >Because portmgr@ is using it? There're numerous cases when unmaintained, >buggy, >vulnerable and plainly dangerous stuff stays in tree because someone in portmgr >gang likes it when other applications not used by them being removed without >prior discussion notice. Because your opinion doesn't matter. Neither is >mine.
I am getting heartily tired of your continuous tirade against the portmgr@ community. Please provide evidence to backup your accusations or retract them. As for the removal of obsolete ports - it has been made perfectly clear on many occasions that a MAINTAINER of ports@ means that port is _not_ maintained. If it's a port you use, feel free to take over maintainership. Otherwise that port is subject to removal if any problems with it crop up. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpsPMP9x6Stn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
