On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:15:06PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:09:08PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: > > Actually you can add a dot (.) to these matches, e.g. freebsd[123]* -> > > freebsd[123].*, etc... Have you contacted the maintainer > > (ger...@freebsd.org) by the way? > > My guess? We should rip out the [123] and [23] strings entirely. If > anyone is running ports on FreeBSD 1, they have more problems than they > can count right now. > > I can personally guarantee that ports don't work on 4.x (I ripped out > the compat code several years ago that dealt with gross old make(1) > bugs, etc.) and I think that means not 3.x either. In any case, the > official claim is that the Ports Collection only supports 789 as first- > class citizens right now, not anything older. >
gerald@ has indicated that he'll do something with the official GCC way to deal with 1. versus 10. This patch is a stop gap for others, who like me, will run into a broken lang/gcc while we wait for a better solution. -- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"