Chris Rees <[email protected]> writes:

>> as seen here:
>> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=295602+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2011/cvs-all/20111113.cvs-all
>
> I don't like the proposed solution; it's less hackish to just use
> gmake again; most people have it installed anyway....

A non-hackish solution would involve fixing sys.mk to guard against
recursive inclusion of __MAKE_CONF. bsd.port.mk is known to have
this when using make(1) for do-build.

Not that I mind shoving the issue under the carpet by using gmake.

Index: share/mk/sys.mk
===================================================================
--- share/mk/sys.mk     (revision 228500)
+++ share/mk/sys.mk     (working copy)
@@ -306,10 +306,13 @@ YFLAGS            ?=      -d
        ${CTFCONVERT_CMD}
 
 # FreeBSD build pollution.  Hide it in the non-POSIX part of the ifdef.
+.if !defined(__MAKE_CONF_INCLUDED)
+__MAKE_CONF_INCLUDED=
 __MAKE_CONF?=/etc/make.conf
 .if exists(${__MAKE_CONF})
 .include "${__MAKE_CONF}"
 .endif
+.endif
 
 .if defined(__MAKE_SHELL) && !empty(__MAKE_SHELL)
 SHELL= ${__MAKE_SHELL}
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to