On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Carmel <carmel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On another thread I noticed a reference to "pkg_libchk". I was > interested in seeing what it would disclose on my system, so I ran it. > > pkg_libchk -Rrv > > It produced a great deal of output. This is one section dealing with > "Firefox" > > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: > /usr/local/lib/firefox/components/libbrowsercomps.so misses libmozalloc.so > found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: > /usr/local/lib/firefox/components/libdbusservice.so misses libmozalloc.so > found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/components/libmozgnome.so > misses libmozalloc.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin misses > libmozalloc.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libsoftokn3.so misses > libmozsqlite3.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so misses > libmozalloc.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so misses > libmozsqlite3.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so misses > libmozalloc.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/plugin-container misses > libmozalloc.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/sdk/lib/libxpcom.so > misses libmozalloc.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/sdk/lib/libxul.so misses > libmozsqlite3.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so. > firefox-9.0.1,1: located: /usr/local/lib/firefox/sdk/lib/libxul.so misses > libmozalloc.so found at /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so. > > If I am reading this correctly, the libmozalloc.so library is missing. I > have tried doing a forced re-install of Firefox, but the same condition > exists. Other packages have several libraries apparently missing also. > Since re-installing the port does not seem to alleviate the problem, > what is the prescribed method of correcting it? > > Thanks! > No, it is telling you that the files listed seem to miss the libraries re[ported, but that they were found in /usr/local/lib/firefox. Firefox does its own thing for finding its sharable libs, so /usr/local/lib/firefox is not in the loader hint, but firefox knows where they are and does load them. this is a side effect of -v. You asked for false positives and you got them. Oh, and specifying -R or -r is only relevant when a specific port is listed. 'pkg_libchk -Rrv' does nothing more than just 'pkg_libchk -v'. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
