On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Matthew Seaman
<m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> That's a systematic problem: callying sysctl like that will return a
> non-zero status if you ask it about a non-existent sysctl, but doing
> that is basically the point of the test. One fix would be:
>
>  HAS_SSE!=  ${SYSCTL} -i -n hw.instruction_sse 2>/dev/null

Why is this in a port? This should be based on an OPTION.

>
> It's only a warning though, so INDEX generation should still work.



-- 
Eitan Adler
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to