On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:44:25PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Barry Tigner <tig...@msu.edu> (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:16:27 -0500): > > > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by > > eagle) > > > > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need > > an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14 > > version. > > > > Are there plans to update linux_base-f10 sometime this year ? > > Those which have the knowledge to produce a more recent linux_base > port, don't seem to have the time to do this. Those which tell to have > time and express interest to do this, seem to lose interest or time > when they get get aware of what needs to be done (see > http://www.leidinger.net/blog/2011/08/29/howto-create-a-new-linux_base-port/ > and > http://www.leidinger.net/blog/2011/09/01/howto-add-linux-infrastructure-ports-for-a-new-linux_base-port/) > > Or in short: we are aware that we need something more recent since a > long time, but there are no plans. Volunteers welcome.
Maybe this is something the foundation can sponsor?
pgpvt4MVH46rZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
