On 10 Apr 2012 10:33, "Michael Scheidell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 4/10/12 5:16 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> >> maintainer that something is wrong. >> >> There are quite a few large grey areas between those, but that's the >> general outline. > > so, if the maintainer knows something, and knows it won't ever get fixed, then 'NOT_FOR_ARCHS' is best, > if its an unknown/ maybe osversion, something the maintainer didn't know about, portmgr might mark it broken wrapped in a .if ${ARCH}. > >
Yes. Bsd.port.options.mk is required beforehand of course. Chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
