On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 06:40:11PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:38:50AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 5/21/12 11:36 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > >>> When would have been a better time? > >>> > >> after it was regression tested? > >> after the security posture (susosin patch) wasn't downgraded? > > > > after a announcement in ports/UPDATING saying it will become the default > > no later than ...XX...XX...XX days "be prepared!" > > I think that the best will be to not have any default "php5" port and > just use php52, php53, php54, php5X, php60... as we have apache20, > apache22, apache24, or mysql50-server, mysql51-server, mysql55-server. > > There is no default apache2 or mysql5-server, so there is no confusion > what is / what will be installed. > > Then it can be choosed in make.conf what version will be used as > default, similar to WITH_MYSQL_VER=51 or APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 >
I agree. This does seem like a very sane option. -- - (2^(N-1)) _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"