On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:40:15AM +0000, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Sorry if I confused you with more than one comment in one email. Next > time I will send multiple emails with just one comment in each email. > I hope this helps.
Please try to be civil. > -----Original message----- > From: "Mikhail T." <mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com> > To: Michael Scheidell <scheid...@freebsd.org> > Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> > Sent: Thu, Jun 21, 2012 11:32:59 GMT+00:00 > Subject: etoile ports dropped for strange reason (Re: freebsd-ports Digest, > Vol 474, Issue 7) > > On 21.06.2012 06:54, Michael Scheidell wrote: > you are more then welcome to adopt them. > Is the above REALLY, what "API no longer supported" means these days? > -mi The release in our ports tree is not recommended upstream anymore. Quoting the upstream webpage: "Take note they [old releases] won't usually work with recent LLVM and GNUstep releases." As the port is unmaintained and the version in our tree is not recommended for use anymore it was deprecated. Sure, the reason could be more clear. I will commit an update that reflects that to make it more clear. If you would like to see this port remain in the tree I recommend adopting it and keeping it in working order (first step is to update it to a recommended release). -- WXS _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
