On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Kevin Oberman <kob6...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote: >> On 27 September 2012 22:52, Kevin Oberman <kob6...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there >>> should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are >>> two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect >>> should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell >>> wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line >>> in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. >> >> On a quick look, this seems correct. Please file a PR so it doesn't get lost! > > Wow! Sounds exactly like one of my responses. PR ports/172131. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi, I had the same problem yesterday and committed a fix (r304984) several hours ago. Thanks. Regards, sunpoet _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
