My apologies. I use portmaster. I don't know why I typed portupgrade in that original message. Looking at the history file from my shell I see "portmaster -o textproc/ack p5-ack-1.96_1" was used to correct the fact that p5-ack was leftover after a "portmaster -a" run.
I agree duplicating the info in UPDATING would be unnecessary. I did not have it in my procedures to look into MOVING. I will do that from now on. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 January 2013 18:40, Vick Khera <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> There should be a MOVED entry which portmaster should have > >> automatically noticed. If not, let us know. > >> > > > > portmaster did install ack for me, but left p5-ack sitting around as > well. > > Hm, you said portupgrade in the original email? Which did you actually > use? > > When I moved the port, I put this line in MOVED: > > textproc/p5-ack|textproc/ack|2013-01-06|Not just a perl module > > Putting a line in UPDATING would defeat the object of the MOVED file. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
