Hi all, Just to get an answer to this thread:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Raphael Eiselstein wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:51:09PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > # <UNIQUENAME>_WITH_BDB_VER > > in /etc/make.conf? > havn't tried yet. But for me it makes more sens to pin all ports to the > *same* version of BDB. I set WITH_BDB_HIGHEST=x in my /etc/make.conf of the build-jail. *All* packages depending on db4x will be linked to db44 now, as this is the highest version. I haven't test all binaries "in depth" but different build runds were fine for the last couple of days and I didn't see any problems yet (libchk ...) > Is there any problem linking db44 to *any* port? I didn't see some, but ... ? > Why do we have so much versions of bdb in our ports? I guess there must be technical reasons for this. Can anyone explain? Where are the differneces between db41, db42 and db44? Why not just shipping db44 or higher? Regards Raphael -- Raphael Eiselstein <[email protected]> http://rabe.uugrn.org/ xmpp:[email protected] | https://www.xing.com/profile/Raphael_Eiselstein GnuPG: E7B2 1D66 3AF2 EDC7 9828 6D7A 9CDA 3E7B 10CA 9F2D .........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|..
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
