On 02/19/13 13:48, Chris Rees wrote:
On 19 February 2013 18:56, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr <jnagyjr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/19/13 12:52, er...@freebsd.org wrote:
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous
one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance
that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over
time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for
more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade
and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH.
Please fix any errors as soon as possible.
The ports tree was updated at Tue Feb 19 2013 18:36:41 UTC.
- *sysutils/fusefs-httpfs* <po...@freebsd.org>: fusefs-httpfs-2.0.1.5 <
fusefs-httpfs-2.06.08.26
I have a similar issue with ruby:
ruby-1.9.3.327,1 > succeeds port (port has 1.9,1)
CC'd to ruby@
I'm guessing you're using portversion? Is the pkgdb up to date?
[crees@pegasus]~% make -f /usr/ports/lang/ruby19/Makefile -VPORTVERSION
1.9.3.385
Chris
No, pkg version in a crontab entry from which I also update ports nightly:
00 01 * * * root /usr/local/bin/svn up
/usr/ports; /usr/sbin/pkg version -vL= > /root/updated-pkg-list
(before anyone asks, despite having PATH defined, I still need to put
full path on commands, dunno why)
--
Yours in Christ,
Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
