On 25 March 2013 10:49, Alex Dupre <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Eitan Adler ha scritto: >> This is insufficient to include, say, line 212: >> >> "raknet-* devel/raknet Original license is >> Indy license, special authorization granted to provide RakNet under >> GPL v3" > > Ehmm, I could argue about the private email permission
The email has been made public (see the files directory). > but if it's > listed in LEGAL it should be marked as RESTRICTED or NO_CDROM, otherwise > it should not listed there or NO_PACKAGE. However, merely being listed as NO_PACKAGE is insufficient as some NO_PACKAGE entries are not for legal issues. > (the LICENSE framework already says that > special authorization has been granted). It should also be listed in LEGAL in this case (there was a long discussion about this in the past). -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
