I found some problems in your patch.
- probably distinfo is not correct
- net/rubygem-rubytter needs to be updated to 1.5.0 or newer
2013-04-22 3:47 olli hauer wrote:
The patch updates the port to version 2.1.0 (ruby 1.9 is supported
since 1.3.x)
I can't make out why the port was marked as broken almost 2 years ago.
When the port was marked as broken, PORTVERSION was 1.9.0 (already
newer than 1.3.x).
It can't be broken with ruby 1.9.
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta <m...@vmeta.jp>
2013-04-22 3:47 olli hauer wrote:
On 2013-04-21 12:55, Koichiro IWAO wrote:
2013-04-21 17:30 に lini...@freebsd.org さんは書きました:
portname: net-im/rubygem-termtter
description: Terminal based Twitter client
maintainer: d...@freebsd.org
deprecated because: Does not work with Ruby 1.9
expiration date: 2013-05-02
build errors: none.
overview:
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net-im&portname=rubygem-termtter
I strongly disagree to delete net-im/rubygem-termtter.
It is mismarked as BROKEN by portmgr for one year even if it
perfectly works with ruby 1.9.
Would you mind to test the following patch (update to 2.1.0).
http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/rubygem-termtter.diff
The patch updates the port to version 2.1.0 (ruby 1.9 is supported
since 1.3.x)
Patch is not tested, I avoid to install ruby on my machines.
--
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta <m...@vmeta.jp>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
