http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_on_FreeBSD#Downloads_.28stable.29
Haven't used this. Also Horde is as hard as you make it. Personally, I think dealing with all XML and internal tools stuff on Zimbra is worse than Horde and it's config files and dependencies. That being said, I haven't used the new Horde stuff in ports, my install is still a couple of years old. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Paul Pathiakis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have tried building many pieces of groupware so that I can replace MS at > various client sites. > > However: > > zimbra? No port. (Hardcoded /opt/zimbra) > kolab? No port. (Hardcoded /kolab - This could work if they got rid of > the idiocy of "OpenPKG") > (A kolab port could easily be done if all the dependencies their rpms were > made into a port for it. - It should work fairly easily with ZFS) > > Citadel? No port. Got it working and seems pretty decent. > > SimpleGroupware - Not DB independent, MySQL only > Tine? Not DB independent, MySQL only (Who does that in this day and age?) > > Horde? Port is cumbersome and very few tips anywhere to get it up and > running quickly on FreeBSD (Is there a doc I can't find?) > Horde > Web? Same as Horde > > Egroupware? Sweet... Works nice and seems very useful. Many compliments > from people on how well it works. > > > Phpgroupware? Not really groupware in the form of the others above. > > I'm just evaluating. I have no affiliation with any. However, the lack > thereof when we could be inserting groupware FreeBSD servers in clients... :-) > > Thank you for checking into this and creating real ports and/or documentation. > > P. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" -- Adam Vande More _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
