On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:47:47PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:56:07AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > > > So we just got done porting most of the tree to a new options syntax > > > and now we want to change it again? :-) > > > > Yeah, why not? ;-) > > > > I've discussed that idea before with bapt@ on IRC; there is absolutely > > no reasons why we should not use now-free nice, short OPTIONS knob again. > > Perhaps your proposal would carry more weight, feedback and/or testing > results if it included a patch and an example port with the modified values > for your new idea.
Surely, patch would be the next step. > This has been quiet successful in the recent past with bapt's proposals for > options, uses, etc. Except that sometimes I think they are not being discussed enough prior to commit. ;-) ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
