Am 10.10.2013 13:56, schrieb Bryan Drewery:
On 10/10/2013 5:00 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I've run poudriere distclean -n.
It took about an hour.
All the time /usr/ports/distfiles was empty,
which was confirmed at the end:

*skip*

OME}})
make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
clang: not found
make: "/pdr/ports/lang/v8/Makefile" line 24: warning: Couldn't read shell's output for "clang --version | /usr/bin/head -1 | /usr/bin/sed -e 's/.*clang version \([0-9]\)\.\([0-9]\).*/\1\2/'" make: "/pdr/ports/mail/p5-Sendmail-Milter/Makefile" line 22: warning: Couldn't read shell's output for "/usr/local/bin/perl5.16.3 -V:usethreads | /usr/bin/awk '/define/ { print "define"; exit }'"

====>> Gathering list of actual distfiles
====>> No stale distfiles to cleanup
#

So what was it doing all this time?
I think I probably misunderstand
the purpose of "poudriere distclean".
It's not just checking all exising
files under /usr/ports/distfiles
to see which are outdated, is it?
It's traversing the whole of the
ports tree, right? Why?

It is looking at every port's Makefile you specify and then comparing to
the distfiles you have. Perhaps it can be optimized more.


Maybe that can be written to a sqlite database?
pkgng already uses them, so poudriere could do the same.
Add the distfiles on the first run of "distclean" and then update the database every time "portsnap update" is run. Maybe even better if the database was part
of the ports tree, just like the INDEX files.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to