On 23/11/13 13:20, geoffroy desvernay wrote: > On 12/07/2013 14:57, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: >> Le 10/07/2013 23:54, olli hauer a écrit : >>>> Here it would be ap22-mod_php5 and ap24-mod_php5. >>>> >>> >>> Thats what I thought with your first mail and I suspect this is a good idea. >> >> Yep, it was what I meant. So do you think I should contact the maintainer ? >> > I second this, as php-fpm is more and more used, with apache, nginx, > lighttpd... There are also cases where only php-cli is needed (at least > we use that too) > > I like the way debian handle this: php-cli/php-fpm/php-cgi/php-module > are packaged independently (and in freebsd we could have ap22-mod-php > and ap24-mod-php). > > The difficulty may be that it would make some more ports to maintain for > Alex, who may need some help (?) > > My 2 cts... > > ps: re-using this thread as I didn't find (missed?) any more recent > discussion about this... >
Yeah, Debian's package split is nice (and not only for PHP but everything else). But I'm not sure if we want to make x packages we have to make x ports. I mean, it is very useful when distributing packages and I'm not sure the port system cannot make x packages from 1 only port. -- Florent Peterschmitt | Please: flor...@peterschmitt.fr | * Avoid HTML/RTF in E-mail. +33 (0)6 64 33 97 92 | * Send PDF for documents. http://florent.peterschmitt.fr | * Trim your quotations. Really. Proudly powered by Open Source | Thank you :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature