On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:07:28 +0200 Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you provided link to the original discussion, it would take much > less energy and time to refresh the memory. Forgot to include it, sorry. Thanks for you response and the patch. > > I looked over this, and I think that r211706 can be refined, by only > calling atexit hooks for 'wrong' dso when the call to __cxa_finalize() > is from the real dlclose(), as opposed to the process exit. For me, > with the world where the patch is applied, your 'major tom' test > passes. Makes sense. > > Of course, when dso1 registers __cxa_atexit hook located in dso2, and > dso2 is unloaded before dso1, the hooks are called in the wrong order > still, but the only alternatives there are either crash or do not call > such hooks at all. Sounds like a good solution. PHP (and similar) crashes are avoided while clean code isn't affected. I will try the patch in my specific use case to make sure it works there as well. -- Michael Gmelin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
