El día Thursday, February 06, 2014 a las 02:36:30PM +0100, Christopher J. Ruwe
escribió:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 23:26:18 -0800
> Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If you use poudriere, you can roll your own packages with custom
> > options and maintain things pretty reasonably, but for a single
> > system (or two), this is a bit of overkill. As things stand, this is
> > a real pain to use customized ports and packages from the standard
> > FreeBSD distributions. I'm waiting with great excitement for this to
> > appear, though I have no idea if it is near or far.
>
> I really don't think so. Even with a single machine, poudriere
> literally saved my a.. pretty bottom several times breaking on
> implicit dependencies which would have popped up ages later with nasty
> and difficult to trace problems/errors.
>
> I think anybody who compiles from ports should _really_ use
> poudriere. I even think it should be strongly suggested in the
> handbook. (I'd be willing to write that up for that matter.)
Please point me to the existing documentation. I don't see the string
"poudriere" in our handbook.
Thx
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
