On 11 March 2014 08:22, John Marino <freebsd.cont...@marino.st> wrote: > On 3/11/2014 13:16, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 11 March 2014 07:05, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> To be able to migrate most of the zip files to use bsdtar when they case we >>> have >>> added USES=zip[:infozip] for consistency I do plan to make the same kind of >>> USES >>> for every kind of archivers. I am puzzled on how to handle all the tar >>> extensions what would your propose? >>> >>> One USES per extension? (USES=xz, USES=bzip2 etc?) >>> >>> or One USES=tar with arguments for extensions? >> >> Why does tar need an extension? why can't tar use the DISTFILE >> itself? tar supports auto-detection of the format which it is >> unzipping. > > For the automatic DISTFILES definition I assume.
Can we not use the existing solution of EXTRACT_SUFX ? -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
