On 3/14/2014 12:08, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: > John Marino wrote: > >> I wanted to suggest that maybe portscout can not send any notice to >> ports@ by rule if the port is unmaintained. > > On the other hand, seeing that a certain port is unmaintained might be an > incentive for someone to pick it up. Apparently it's just this doomsday > game that nobody seems to care for ;-)
we get periodic summaries of all broken and deprecated reports. I don't see why that approach can be extended to this, e.g. "unmaintained reports with available updates". Once a month to cover every port like this is okay. The current approach of spamming per port on every change is not really okay. John _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
