Am Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:20:43 -0400 schrieb Robert Huff <roberth...@rcn.com>:
> Johan Hendriks <joh.hendr...@gmail.com> writes: > > > As far as I know, there is some libiconv functionality missing in > > the base libiconv implementation. That is the reason some ports > > installed converters/libiconv from ports. > > From reading the mailing lists and skimming the PRs, it > appears subversion may be such a port. Is there a current list of > ports know to need the ports version of iconv? > > Respectfully, > > > Robert Huff > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" Thanks on feedback to all. Meanwhile I've read a lot about iconv and to be honest, things are becoming even less clear. I am having not enough experience with FreeBSD to completely judge the situation. But obviously replacement of the ports version of iconv is still an ongoing process somehow related to 10.0-RELEASE. Besides the full list of affected ports I would like to know, if the 11 ports on my 10.0-RELEASE system currently depending on converters/libiconv all really have to. Or could they be built against the base iconv? My attempts so far to rebuild them with the /usr/ports/UPDATING advice was not successful. My feeling says that information about iconv in /usr/ports/UPDATING is not complete. Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
