On 03/22/2014 02:27 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:29 AM, John Marino > <freebsd.cont...@marino.st>wrote: > >> In December, Nicola set the license for Arabtex to LPPL10. >> The result is that the port is no longer packagable: >> >>> ====>> Ignoring arabic/arabtex: License LPPL10 needs confirmation, but >> BATCH is defined >>> build of /usr/ports/arabic/arabtex ended at Mon Mar 17 16:12:44 PDT 2014 >> >> From a quick conversation on IRC, I got the idea that the license was >> correct and many more Tex packages should also have this license. >> If/when that happens, does that mean Tex packages are only to be built >> from source? >> >> Is it correct that LPPL10 can't be built in a batch?
No. You must accept the license before you can build the port, and you cannot interactively accept a license in non-interactive batch mode. See the commments in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk for what to set in make.conf to automatically accept certain licenses. > > Aside from any possible impact of the license, the Makefile contains: > NO_BUILD= yes > so it ill never be packaged and redistributed. This is not an artifact of > the license and I don't know of the license would also block packaging. NO_BUILD means only that the configure and compile steps are not necessary for this port. The option you're thinking of is NO_PACKAGE. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-restrictions.html -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net <cyber...@cyberleo.net> Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"