On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:41:21PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:27:15 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Hello, Tijl. > > You wrote 8 июня 2014 г., 14:16:14: > > > > TC> I don't want to stop you from doing this, but if I were you I'd just > > TC> wait for subpackages support. You may want to merge all those ports > > TC> back into one port then. > > It is second way. But I didn't seen any estimations about subpackages > > support, and "separate mod_dav_svn" is request which I got twice a month. > > Yes, I have some questions about subpackages myself. For instance, will > a port be able to depend on the subpackage of another port? Will the > infrastructure be smart enough to build just that subpackage then or will > it build the full package (and all of its dependencies) and then split up > the stage directory? If a port has to "smart" then you may want to split > subversion up now because you'll need all that logic for subpackages too.
yes to all questions :) that is how subpackage will be, concerning the ETA, now pkg 1.3 has enough support for it, so after EOL of pkg_install I'll push the support for subpackages. regards, Bapt
pgpO17iH9UqN5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
