--On June 8, 2014 at 10:32:33 AM -0600 Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Yes, I do have a few ports with none-default options. The problem is,
they're critical ports (like apache22).
At present, these have to be built from ports. Long-term, there is a
plan to have multiple packages for ports with options.
It seems like a completely unworkable solution to me. For example, say you
have a port with 10 options. Imagine how many different binaries you would
have to have to cover every possible combination of selected options. It
would take a huge amount of storage
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
*******************************************
"It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
"There are some ideas so wrong that only a very
intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
