On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:49:03PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Steve Kargl > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:14:43PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > >> I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been. > >> Its not the first message ranting about something broken. > >> > > > > I can't help but notice how poorly some decisions are made > > within the ports community, and no, this isn't the nearly > > the first poor decision. > > > > If the port has an option to build the profiled libraries > > and that option is selected, then I expect the port to > > build the profiled library. > > You're welcome to help the ports committers to maintain over 20k ports > and raise the quality. > Are you looking for mentors for your ports@ commit bit? >
Check your history. I was a port maintainer many years ago. Dropped maintainership of all my ports after several unreviewed changes by others to those ports were made. These unreviewed changes broke those ports and I was forced to clean up the mess. This of course has little to do with the issue that I have raised here. A port, namely math/lapack, has an option to build profiled libraries and the port does not honor that option when selected. It's simple Q&A. Either remove the option or fix it. -- Steve _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
