On 01/11/2014 10:19, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 11/1/2014 2:20 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> However, I wonder if it wouldn't make more sense >> to create one file which includes all of the other bits of port >> infrastructure. This should be a text format that people can read >> easily and manipulate with a text editor or standard unix tools. >> Something like UCL might be a good choice. > > That sounds dangerously close to reinventing SRPM.
Now you mention it, yes it does. Although SRPM's are a bit more opaque
than what I had in mind.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
