On 16/07/2015 18:23, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: > So the answer is no: we need a special field in manifests to make > renaming transparent for pkg and, in turn, for users.
How is a renamed package significantly different to choosing between
alternate packages that could fulfil a dependency? Doesn't the
'variable dependency' concept already have what you need to handle name
changes?
Cheers,
Matthew
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
