El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: > On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: > > > On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim > > > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jung-uk,
> > > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi people, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I > > > > > > > > encounter the following problem trying to compile a > > > > > > > > simple code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #include <stdio.h> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from > > > > > > > > hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected > > > > > > > > (got "va_list") > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes > > > > > > > > this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine > > > > > > > > was on FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel > > > > > > > > mailing list [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it was a typo here :) > > > > > > > > > > It seems it's a known tcc bug: > > > > > > > > > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there something that we can do about it? > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ > > > > > > It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without > > > touching src tree, e.g., > > > > > > --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++ > > > sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7 +152,7 > > > @@ */ > > > #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef __builtin_va_lis > > > t > > > __va_list; /* internally known to gcc */ -#elif > > > defined(lint) > > > +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || defined(lint) typedef char * > > > __va_list; /* pretend */ #endif #if > > > defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) && > > > !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ > > > > > > > If you need doing some changes into the src tree. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286265 > That's OK! > > So, what do you recommend in such case? Would it be much trouble > > add the necessary changes to run TCC again? Furthermore, TinyCC > > developer has ignored this issue completely. > > The only hack I see is defining __va_list as a macro from libtcc.c > but > it is ugly. > Probably this should be discussed in the tinycc-devel ML. In the meanwhile we can try your dirty hack :-) -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <c...@fbsd.es> PGP fingerprint = C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part