On 05 Aug 2015, at 22:05, Kevin Oberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Today I decided to relocate my ports source from the old specific mirror to > the new svn.freebsd.org. Seemed like just one easy command, but not quite. > > First, if subversion is built with the default options, it will refuse to > do https:// with the confusing message that the URL format was not > recognized. I checked and my svn was notbuilt with SASL. SASL is not on by > default. So I rebuilt subversion and now it likes the command, but won't > accept the certificate: > Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.freebsd.org:443': > - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the > fingerprint to validate the certificate manually! > Certificate information: > - Hostname: svn.freebsd.org > - Valid: from Jun 22 00:00:00 2015 GMT until Jun 22 23:59:59 2016 GMT > - Issuer: Gandi, Paris, Paris, FR > - Fingerprint: E9:37:73:80:B5:32:1B:93:92:94:98:17:59:F0:FA:A2:5F:1E:DE:B9 > (R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? > > Indeed, it does not appear that Gandi is on the certificate.txt. file > installed by ca_root_nss.
Not directly, the Gandi Standard SSL CA 2 certificate is issued by the following root CA: Serial Number: 01:fd:6d:30:fc:a3:ca:51:a8:1b:bc:64:0e:35:03:2d Subject: C=US, ST=New Jersey, L=Jersey City, O=The USERTRUST Network, CN=USERTrust RSA Certification Authority > Is this a problem with the ca_root_nss port, the certificate, of is > something hacked? Clearly, I am not about to trust the certificate as it > now stands. Which version of ca_root_nss do you have? Mine is 3.19.1_1, and it definitely has the above root CA in /etc/ssl/cert.pem. -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
