On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:11:36 -0500 Chris Inacio <nacho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all, > > I was considering adding some more support into some tooling/ports for > FreeBSD and I thought it would probably be good to get configuration > management support some thought. So I can understand under certain > Linux flavors (e.g. RedHat) that puppet is the de facto choice - > since the distribution packager has chosen one. > > Is there a dominant one for FreeBSD? > > Happy if you would just reply with which one, if any, you use. If > you want to add more to the conversation, that's fine. I understand > the mailing list I posted this to and the likely audience - as I said > I started think about this from adding more support into some ports. For my relatively simple task of occasional push of identical configuration files to dozens of jails I use salt. -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"