On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Carmel <carmel...@outlook.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:42:54 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated: > > >Hi! > > > >> >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them > >> >upstream: > >> > > >> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542 > >> > >> For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an > >> access that report: > >> > >> You are not authorized to access bug #11542. > > > >Yes. It seems clamav bugzilla is restrictive and I can not change > >that, as submitter of that bug. > > Now that makes about "ZERO" sense. Why would you (meaning clamav) want > to hide bug information? Dumbest thing I ever saw (almost). Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security mechanism and allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con even be looked at. Why would anyone have an issue with that? I mean, don't we all want more zero-day vulnerabilities? (Sorry, Guess I put on my sarcasm hat today.) -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
