On 20/08/2016 11:40, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 20/08/2016 9:17 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
Only WEBP is broken, make sure the option is set to off.
Do you think the (error) messaging be improved to make it more obvious
to users what's the fail condition is, but more importantly, also what
they should/could do about it?
The current message does neither.
./koobs
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
Wait, so what it actually means that the port is marked as broken? I
understood that the maintainer marked the port as broken because it
discovered that the port doesn't compile because of circular dependency?
Who then actually marked the port as broken?
Greg
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
