Thanks for the help. I made some adjustments, and now both my pending ports are passing `poudriere testport`.
Could someone please commit; https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212468 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212467 Thanks all! Jev On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:08 AM Mathieu Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 23/09/2016 à 15:26, Alexander Moisseev via freebsd-ports a écrit : > > On 23.09.2016 15:45, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> > >> I don't really know what it does, but to test a port, it seems > >> overcomplicated, everything is already done by the framework. > >> > >> Best would be for you to put: > >> > >> DEVELOPER=yes > >> > >> in /etc/make.conf > >> > >> and simply run "make" as a regular user, it will check everything that > >> can be. > >> > > I believe the most important difference is "port test" does real > > install (into a temp dir) and deinstall, "make" doesn't (merely staging). > > I don't really see a point in really installing the port, the only thing > this achieve is test pkg add <file> works. > > These days, it is better to use poudriere testport[1] to test your work. > At least you can be certain everything is ok. > > 1: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html > > -- > Mathieu Arnold > > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
