Am 13.10.2016 um 07:20 schrieb Peter Beckman:
> 2. Why is GPL3 out of the question? Is the user going to resell the
> device
>    as a service? If the user is simply "using" the software, no
> disclosure
>    of other software is necessary. Only if your user is attempting to
> "make
>    money" from the sale of the software or service powered by rsync does
>    the source need to be disclosed. 
What does the GPLv3 have to do with reselling software as a service?
The _Affero_ GPL variants are what copyleft software-as-a-service, not
the plain GPLv3 itself.

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to ""

Reply via email to